Oklahoma Supreme Court Strikes Down Admitting Privileges Law as ‘Undue Burden’ on Abortion Access
Under the guise of the protection of womens health, [the law] creates an undue burden on a womans access to abortion, violating protected rights under our federal Constitution, wrote Justice Joseph Watt wrote on behalf of the court.Every woman in this country has a constitutionally protected right to choose whether to terminate her pregnancy before viability. This right is protected from undue interference from the state.
Lawmakers had passed Senate Bill 1848 in 2014, which required abortionists to have admitting privileges at a hospital not more than 30 miles away in the event that a womansuffers an injury during an abortion or if the child is born alive.
On any day when any abortion is performed in a facilityproviding abortions, a physician with admitting privileges at ageneral medical surgical hospital which offers obstetrical orgynecological care in this state within thirty (30) miles of wherethe abortion is being performed must remain on the premises of thefacility to facilitate the transfer of emergency cases ifhospitalization of an abortion patient or a child born alive isnecessary and until all abortion patients are stable and ready toleave the recovery room, the law read in part.
But abortionistLarry Burns of Abortion Surgery Center in Norman filed suit to challenge the regulation since he was unable to find a hospital that wanted to work with him, which would result in fines or the closure of his facility.
The law was upheld in February, but Burns, being represented by the New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights, filed an appeal to the state Supreme Court.
In 41 years of private medical practice, Burns has only called an ambulance one time for a patient who was simply observed and released from a local emergency room, Watt wrote on Tuesday. We find there is no evidence to support defendants position that this legislation protects and advances womens health.
He also pointed to the June VS. Supreme Courtdecisionthat struck down a similar admitting privileges bill in Texas.
Whether in Oklahoma, Texas, or elsewhere, allowing politicians to trample womens rights by shutting down clinics is not only wrongits dangerous, Nancy Northup, presidentof the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement. Todays decision is a victory for Oklahoma women and another rebuke to politicians pushing underhanded laws that attack a womans constitutionally guaranteed right to safe, legal abortion.
Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin said that she was disappointed by the outcome.
Im disappointed to see another pro-life law struck down by the courts, she remarked. Like many bills passed in Oklahoma, this bill was designed to protect the health and welfare of the mother along with the life of the unborn, which always should be among our societys priorities.
Fallin, who describes herself as the most pro-life governor in the nation, vetoed a bill in May that would have criminalized the performance of an abortion in the state and revoke the medical license of any physicians who ends the life of an unborn child.
A special message from the publisher…Dear Reader, because of your generous support, we have received enough funds to send many audio Bibles to Iraqi and Syrian refugees displaced by ISIS in the Middle East. Many have been distributed and received with gladness. nou, as the cold winds of winter blow in, we are seeking to also meet the physical needs of the people by providing fuel-operated heaters for the refugees and their children to stay warm. Would you join us by making a donation today to this important work (James 2:16)? Please click here to send a heater to a refugee family >>